![]() |
Rake Angle - Printable Version +- Devialet Chat (https://devialetchat.com) +-- Forum: Devialet Chat (https://devialetchat.com/Forum-Devialet-Chat) +--- Forum: Tweaker's Corner (https://devialetchat.com/Forum-Tweaker-s-Corner) +--- Thread: Rake Angle (/Thread-Rake-Angle--7223) Pages:
1
2
|
RE: Rake Angle - Pim - 25-Apr-2021 (25-Apr-2021, 10:35)ogs Wrote: @Pim I agree with all you say apart from DSP. DSP is the only way to make a conventional box speaker time-coincident. In 1991-92 Celestion demonstrated that a "digital equalizer", the DLP600, could make a speaker with a 12dB/octave cross-over - the SL600si - time-coincident. Again it is John Atkinson of Stereophile who show this in measurements: https://www.stereophile.com/content/celestion-sl600si-loudspeaker-dlp600-digital-equalizer-1992-measurements-part-2 What I'm referring to is that by tilting a speaker wrongly you can mess up the time alignment. There can only be one position for your ears to be where the tweeter and mid/woofer line up correctly, whether the speaker is build time aligned or not. RE: Rake Angle - Norty - 26-Apr-2021 Thanks all, learned a lot from these postings. I have been thinking about new speakers once the lock down is over and will now add to the list of criteria that they are time coincident. In the meantime I took Pim's advice and adjusted to what felt comfortable and natural. Will play with it further over the next week but think I have it. Again thanks all for your help! |