23-Jan-2016, 22:36
Found this review by Hans Wetzel, created 1 februari 2016 
. Way ahead...
http://www.goodsound.com/index.php/2-unc...udspeakers
. Way ahead... http://www.goodsound.com/index.php/2-unc...udspeakers
23-Jan-2016, 22:57
The first intelligent review !
I agree with everything except that I personally like the look.
It is so different it takes time to appreciate.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I agree with everything except that I personally like the look.
It is so different it takes time to appreciate.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
25-Jan-2016, 04:57
I agree with everything he says, including his thoughts about design and marketing.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
25-Jan-2016, 15:21
Yes, excellent review. It is nice to see someone who has listened to high-end gear compare a pair of Silver Phantoms to decent stereo systems not to lifestyle devices.
It is also nice to see both the praise and criticism match the reality what I heard, unlike some other reviews. In my audition of a pair of white Phantoms I agree that they had the best imaging I've heard (better even than KEF Blades or LS50 which were my previous reference point), but had lifestyle-quality bass (lots of it but lower quality) and lacked ultimate transparency/resolution.
Should this thread be duplicated or moved to the Reviews section of this forum?
It is also nice to see both the praise and criticism match the reality what I heard, unlike some other reviews. In my audition of a pair of white Phantoms I agree that they had the best imaging I've heard (better even than KEF Blades or LS50 which were my previous reference point), but had lifestyle-quality bass (lots of it but lower quality) and lacked ultimate transparency/resolution.
Should this thread be duplicated or moved to the Reviews section of this forum?
26-Jan-2016, 08:27
Interesting review. It seems to be the most professional review thus far. He mentions using them with his TV. I'm surprised there was no mention of audio latency in this setup. I wonder if that was an oversight, or he simply didn't notice any.
26-Jan-2016, 13:12
(26-Jan-2016, 08:27)kameraguy Wrote: [ -> ]He mentions using them with his TV. I'm surprised there was no mention of audio latency in this setup.
There is not discernible latency here (I am watching TV right now), though it might be due to my TV being a bit slow at video processing.
26-Jan-2016, 18:57
(26-Jan-2016, 13:12)EvPa Wrote: [ -> ](26-Jan-2016, 08:27)kameraguy Wrote: [ -> ]He mentions using them with his TV. I'm surprised there was no mention of audio latency in this setup.
There is not discernible latency here (I am watching TV right now), though it might be due to my TV being a bit slow at video processing.
By me with a samsung F9000 it's also oke
26-Jan-2016, 20:37
(26-Jan-2016, 18:57)Johnnydev Wrote: [ -> ]By me with a samsung F9000 it's also oke
Mine is a Samsung H8000, which is quite similar to yours but without 4K.
26-Jan-2016, 21:50
I see...I am assuming you guys are using optical from the TV to one of the phantoms? Good to know there is no noticeable lag via this connection.
27-Jan-2016, 07:56
(26-Jan-2016, 21:50)Lopkameraguy Wrote: [ -> ]I see...I am assuming you guys are using optical from the TV to one of the phantoms? Good to know there is no noticeable lag via this connection.
Yes i am using optical from tv to my left phantom