(18-Jun-2014, 09:25)PhilP Wrote: [ -> ]I'm in e-mail contact with Thierry and have mentioned it to him. Obviously their s/w team know what they've implemented but I have suggested that they could find a more elegant solution and also clean-up the 'disable App' function.
Regards, Philip
Why don't you write a bit of more elegant code and e-mail it to him?
(18-Jun-2014, 21:45)f1eng Wrote: [ -> ] (18-Jun-2014, 09:25)PhilP Wrote: [ -> ]I'm in e-mail contact with Thierry and have mentioned it to him. Obviously their s/w team know what they've implemented but I have suggested that they could find a more elegant solution and also clean-up the 'disable App' function.
Regards, Philip
Why don't you write a bit of more elegant code and e-mail it to him?
As you may have guessed, I haven't written any code, let alone elegant code this century
As Antoine says, this problem has been solved many times before so hopefully one of the 40+ engineers will take a look at some stage.
(19-Jun-2014, 16:08)PhilP Wrote: [ -> ] (18-Jun-2014, 21:45)f1eng Wrote: [ -> ] (18-Jun-2014, 09:25)PhilP Wrote: [ -> ]I'm in e-mail contact with Thierry and have mentioned it to him. Obviously their s/w team know what they've implemented but I have suggested that they could find a more elegant solution and also clean-up the 'disable App' function.
Regards, Philip
Why don't you write a bit of more elegant code and e-mail it to him?
As you may have guessed, I haven't written any code, let alone elegant code this century
As Antoine says, this problem has been solved many times before so hopefully one of the 40+ engineers will take a look at some stage.
Just teasing.
I do, however, expect that one of the 40 engineers has already given it considerable thought and work and the solution we currently have is considered the best to achieve instant switch on that they have had signed off.