+- Devialet Chat (https://devialetchat.com)
+-- Forum: Devialet Chat (https://devialetchat.com/Forum-Devialet-Chat)
+--- Forum: Phantom I (103 DB, 108 DB, Premier Classic, Silver & Gold) (https://devialetchat.com/Forum-Phantom-I-103-DB-108-DB-Premier-Classic-Silver-Gold)
+--- Thread: is bluetooth "that" much worse than wifi? (/Thread-is-bluetooth-that-much-worse-than-wifi)
is bluetooth "that" much worse than wifi? - ChalleB - 05-Dec-2017
am enjoying my bluetooth experience with my silvers,
sounds as good as wifi to my ears and so much easier to use.....
RE: is bluetooth "that" much worse than wifi? - ragwo - 05-Dec-2017
If it's fine by you, just use BT. Wifi supports lossless audio, BT doesn't.
RE: is bluetooth "that" much worse than wifi? - ChalleB - 05-Dec-2017
thanks but how big a deal is lossless audio?
RE: is bluetooth "that" much worse than wifi? - ragwo - 05-Dec-2017
If you don't play lossless files, you won't tell the difference. The difference could be quite substantial when streaming high resolution files. It sounds better in every way.
RE: is bluetooth "that" much worse than wifi? - daibaron - 05-Dec-2017
I hope this helps
https://www.lifewire.com/what-to-know-ab...th-3134591
RE: is bluetooth "that" much worse than wifi? - Jamington2004 - 05-Dec-2017
I tried Bluetooth to watch TV with my golds - unwatchable due to the extra delay in sound
Optical is near perfect for me in that regards
Have no need to try it for streaming music
RE: is bluetooth "that" much worse than wifi? - mac - 06-Dec-2017
Every player I know can deal with the delay and fine tune it so, this is a non issue.
About BT ; most recent BT chipsets in computers are close to a CD quality ; I must admit that my 50 yo ears can hardly make a difference.