+- Devialet Chat (https://devialetchat.com)
+-- Forum: Devialet Chat (https://devialetchat.com/Forum-Devialet-Chat)
+--- Forum: Phantom II (95 DB, 98 DB, Reactor 600 & 900) (https://devialetchat.com/Forum-Phantom-II-95-DB-98-DB-Reactor-600-900)
+--- Thread: One phantom gold or 2 reactor 900 ? (/Thread-One-phantom-gold-or-2-reactor-900)
Pages:
1
2
RE: One phantom gold or 2 reactor 900 ? - RMK - 12-Mar-2019
Hi Juan,
I am not experienced enough in sound to answer this question.
I am very happy with the current setup and it sounds fantastic to me. I usually listen around the 40% volume mark and I am very pleased.
For £50 I have the Behringer UMC 202 HD going L and R into each Reactor using the 3.5mm connection.
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Behringer-U-PHORIA-UMC202HD-Audio-Interface/dp/B00SAV0VP0/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1552409116&sr=8-1&keywords=uphoria+umc202hd
For £50 I thought it was a good way to get stereo until the update comes out. I can use the interface for a condenser microphone anyway so the money is not wasted.
RE: One phantom gold or 2 reactor 900 ? - eniriop - 23-May-2019
(09-Mar-2019, 18:30)Tigrou78 Wrote: Hi guys , a simple question, I have an area of 40 m and I want a device with a minimum of quality, design and power. What do you prefere, A single phantom gold without stereo or 2 reactor 900 ? Thanks for your feedback.
Sp
I have answered your question in the thread below: get the 2 reactors 600, they sound almost the same as a pair of phantom gold (side by side at moderate volume in an average room). They will sound much better than a mono gold for sure (I started with a mono gold myself, long before the stereo reactor was available).
https://devialetchat.com/Thread-Stereo-Reactor-vs-Mono-Classic
RE: One phantom gold or 2 reactor 900 ? - RMK - 25-May-2019
I'm bias!!
https://youtu.be/CnMWk16RooQ