Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200
#11
(23-Oct-2016, 08:40)Antoine Wrote: Read the other news threads. It's off topic here but to give a short answer; No one knows yet what the new Devialet OS/streamer board will support. The only thing mentioned thus far by Devialet on the ethernet streaming front is uPNP/DLNA. I think the chances of them implementing an open, advanced streaming protocol like AES67, Dante or Ravenna are close to zero.

I've had an email exchange with Xilica. Among other things this was written:

"The Dante license is very expensive and then you have to purchase all the Dante cards used insideĀ 
the product from them. Also expensive. So a manufacturer has to be certain that the return will validate the costs."

The reason Dante was mentioned is that Devialet has a few commercial installations of Phantoms and in this field ethernet and Dante is used a lot. I believe Xilica has provided the interface to network audio as Devialet (we all know too well) does not provide this.

May be AES67 or Ravenna, but if it's compatible with Dante, the license troll will probably turn up...

Sorry for continuing off topic, but I feel it is relevant to Antoine's post
*
Devialetless!
Roon, ROCK/Audiolense XO/Music on NAS/EtherRegen/RoPieee/USPCB/ISORegen/USPCB/Sound Devices USBPre2/Tannoy GOLD 8
250 Pro CI, MicroRendu(1.4), Mutec MC-3+USB
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by mdconnelly - 21-Oct-2016, 20:54
RE: Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by brit - 21-Oct-2016, 21:02
RE: Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by brit - 21-Oct-2016, 21:32
RE: Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by Damon - 21-Oct-2016, 21:43
RE: Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by baddog - 22-Oct-2016, 00:43
Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by samsoum - 22-Oct-2016, 17:35
RE: Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by Cycles2 - 23-Oct-2016, 01:56
RE: Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by Antoine - 23-Oct-2016, 08:40
RE: Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by ogs - 01-Nov-2016, 11:04
RE: Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by davslp - 05-Nov-2016, 15:20
Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by Xander - 05-Nov-2016, 17:01
RE: Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by markush - 04-Dec-2016, 02:44
RE: Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by Antoine - 04-Dec-2016, 14:46
RE: Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by Pim - 04-Dec-2016, 22:06
RE: Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by Dr Tone - 15-Jan-2017, 03:51
RE: Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by Cylob - 15-Jan-2017, 12:56
RE: Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by Dr Tone - 15-Jan-2017, 05:15
Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by samsoum - 15-Jan-2017, 16:08
RE: Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by Dr Tone - 15-Jan-2017, 17:06
Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by samsoum - 15-Jan-2017, 17:10
RE: Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by Dr Tone - 15-Jan-2017, 17:28
Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by samsoum - 15-Jan-2017, 17:53
RE: Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by Arjan - 15-Jan-2017, 20:32
RE: Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by Confused - 15-Jan-2017, 21:21
RE: Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by Dr Tone - 15-Jan-2017, 22:56
RE: Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by Confused - 15-Jan-2017, 23:06
RE: Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by Dr Tone - 15-Jan-2017, 23:17
RE: Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by Dr Tone - 15-Jan-2017, 23:26
RE: Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by Dr Tone - 16-Jan-2017, 14:28
RE: Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by Damon - 17-Jan-2017, 16:52
RE: Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by Dr Tone - 17-Jan-2017, 17:02
RE: Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by Dr Tone - 17-Jan-2017, 20:15
RE: Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by AaronG - 21-Jan-2017, 14:14
RE: Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by Arjan - 30-Jan-2017, 13:21
Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by samsoum - 23-Dec-2017, 06:18

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)