I had the same idea as kjj11, but on a lower budget :-)
I really think MQA is a big step forward.
I heard it recently on a Bluesound server at my dealer played through a NAD Master Series amp and B&W’s latest 800 series (804d/s3) speakers and was very impressed. They had a Bob Dillon and some Eric Clapton MQA which sounded really really good.
So last week I bought a Meridian Explorer 2 for £199- a USB in MQA enabled analogue out DAC, to see how external MQA processing would sound.
I have been testing AIR 3 over ethernet served from my iMAC by ROON which is a killer combination - better sound IMO than ROON bridge via USB and better than AIR 2 direct from iTunes. A bit unstable in beta when switching inputs and sampling rates though!
Yesterday I spent a few hours doing listening tests using the excellent Norwegian 2L sample library as test pieces (all classical):
Mozart: Violin concerto in D major - Allegro,
Vivaldi: Recitative and Aria from Cantata RV 679, "Che giova il sospirar, povero core"
and Joseph Haydn: String Quartet In D, Op. 76, No. 5 - Finale - Presto
in 3 formats :
MQA (24/44 encapsulating the original 352.8kHz / 24bit DXD recording+ deblurring),
CD quality,
and 24/192 or 24/172 FLAC quality,
I had two signal paths:
1) ROON ethernet to a Raspi 3 running RoonBridge ---> USB---> to Meridian Explorer2 --- > analogue in on D200 (192k sampling)
2) ROON ethernet AIR 3 BETA
Here are my findings ( in my room, on my equipment, and with my ageing ears :-) )
Bit Depth K Samp/sec Type Relative Quality (100% =Best I have heard)
24 44 CD 85% Explorer2
24 44 CD 95% AIR 3
24 192 Hi Res 92% Explorer2
24 44 MQA 100% Explorer2
24 192 Hi Res 100% AIR 3
The MQA Explorer2 and the 24/192 AIR3 were identifiably different, but I really couldn't say one was better. The singers and instruments on MQA had a more real body and 3D presence, whereas the 24/192 via AIR3 had more snap, impact and vivacity.
BUT MQA was hugely handicapped by being decoded firstly by the Explorer 2 and then encoded and decoded again by the D200. And yet I felt MQA Explorer2 sound was about as good as 24/192 on AIR3 !
Imagine how the sound could be if the D200 was itself MQA enabled?
Note that the Meridian 2 is not in the same class as the D200 as a DAC, 24/192 tracks sounding a little worse in my set up than 16/44 CD samples played via AIR3.
If Tidal ever start streaming MQA then, in my system, analogue in from the explorer 2 would sound about as good as spending €15-€30 per album for a hi-res 24/192 version - a very good investment for £199 !
Given the leap in quality I heard from the Explorer 2 in standard mode and MQA, native MQA decoding is the way to go for Devialet.
They already have the MIPS to do it ( a spare 400MHz SHARC processor which has around 1600 MFLOPS sustained and 2MByte RAM - considerably greater than the Explorer 2’s XMOS chip with 1000MIPS and 128kB RAM ).
Here’s hoping! Mark
I really think MQA is a big step forward.
I heard it recently on a Bluesound server at my dealer played through a NAD Master Series amp and B&W’s latest 800 series (804d/s3) speakers and was very impressed. They had a Bob Dillon and some Eric Clapton MQA which sounded really really good.
So last week I bought a Meridian Explorer 2 for £199- a USB in MQA enabled analogue out DAC, to see how external MQA processing would sound.
I have been testing AIR 3 over ethernet served from my iMAC by ROON which is a killer combination - better sound IMO than ROON bridge via USB and better than AIR 2 direct from iTunes. A bit unstable in beta when switching inputs and sampling rates though!
Yesterday I spent a few hours doing listening tests using the excellent Norwegian 2L sample library as test pieces (all classical):
Mozart: Violin concerto in D major - Allegro,
Vivaldi: Recitative and Aria from Cantata RV 679, "Che giova il sospirar, povero core"
and Joseph Haydn: String Quartet In D, Op. 76, No. 5 - Finale - Presto
in 3 formats :
MQA (24/44 encapsulating the original 352.8kHz / 24bit DXD recording+ deblurring),
CD quality,
and 24/192 or 24/172 FLAC quality,
I had two signal paths:
1) ROON ethernet to a Raspi 3 running RoonBridge ---> USB---> to Meridian Explorer2 --- > analogue in on D200 (192k sampling)
2) ROON ethernet AIR 3 BETA
Here are my findings ( in my room, on my equipment, and with my ageing ears :-) )
Bit Depth K Samp/sec Type Relative Quality (100% =Best I have heard)
24 44 CD 85% Explorer2
24 44 CD 95% AIR 3
24 192 Hi Res 92% Explorer2
24 44 MQA 100% Explorer2
24 192 Hi Res 100% AIR 3
The MQA Explorer2 and the 24/192 AIR3 were identifiably different, but I really couldn't say one was better. The singers and instruments on MQA had a more real body and 3D presence, whereas the 24/192 via AIR3 had more snap, impact and vivacity.
BUT MQA was hugely handicapped by being decoded firstly by the Explorer 2 and then encoded and decoded again by the D200. And yet I felt MQA Explorer2 sound was about as good as 24/192 on AIR3 !
Imagine how the sound could be if the D200 was itself MQA enabled?
Note that the Meridian 2 is not in the same class as the D200 as a DAC, 24/192 tracks sounding a little worse in my set up than 16/44 CD samples played via AIR3.
If Tidal ever start streaming MQA then, in my system, analogue in from the explorer 2 would sound about as good as spending €15-€30 per album for a hi-res 24/192 version - a very good investment for £199 !
Given the leap in quality I heard from the Explorer 2 in standard mode and MQA, native MQA decoding is the way to go for Devialet.
They already have the MIPS to do it ( a spare 400MHz SHARC processor which has around 1600 MFLOPS sustained and 2MByte RAM - considerably greater than the Explorer 2’s XMOS chip with 1000MIPS and 128kB RAM ).
Here’s hoping! Mark
iTunes & TIDAL HiFi --> ROON on iMac --> ROON RAAT over Ethernet --> D440 Pro--> ProAc D40R floorstanding speakers (SAM)
Also: Linn LP12/Ittok turntable Cables: Nordost Shiva power, Nordost Flatline2 speaker cable
Also: Linn LP12/Ittok turntable Cables: Nordost Shiva power, Nordost Flatline2 speaker cable
Dublin, Ireland