18-Dec-2014, 15:02
(18-Dec-2014, 13:28)weust Wrote:(18-Dec-2014, 12:12)Pim van Vliet Wrote: You don't need to search for long on the net to find a lot of people who know more about audio reproduction that you and I that say that 24/96 is all you need for accurate reproduction and that anything above that can actually sound worse. Devialet themselves recommend 24/96 for analog inputs. 24/192 and 352 are just bigger buckets of the same stuff. Some might sound better but that's not because they're in a bigger bucket but because the mastering was done right. My advice; get the 24/96 version and enjoy the music.
That's not answering my question at all.
Just a waste of my time reading it.
Hi weust, take it easy, we all love to enrich threads by sharing thought, views and experiences. i believe it is part of the fun here.
as for your question, Devialet states that AIR is for Lossless streaming: absolutely no compression of the content up to 24bits/192kHz.
for more details check http://en.devialet.com/technology/devialet-air-en/
Aurender X100L / Transrotor Crescendo TT / Denon DCD1520 / Macbook Pro >> D400 >> Martin Logan Montis
amabrok's system - Latest update (May 2015, Page 11, Post #109)
Dubai, UAE
amabrok's system - Latest update (May 2015, Page 11, Post #109)
Dubai, UAE