Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Devialet Expert isn't good in showing secondary harmonics?
#17
(06-Apr-2016, 13:57)Confused Wrote: I'm with thumb on this one .......

As am I. I've had a few tube amps in the past, and still have a modified Dynamo ST70 somewhere, and I think that the Dev really gives me access to the nuances in the music (or in the recording or file). It's all the micro things; tiny, subtle changes in volume, tone, pitch, timing, that reveal how a singer changes the shape of their throat or mouth, or how a sax player slips air beside the mouthpiece, or how a string is plucked or fretted or bowed.

Crikey, what a sentence.... . I have not heard really expensive tube amps, but the McIntoshes I heard a few months ago were really unappealing, if that is any comparison. I don't know what they were, but there were two mono block power amps, each the size of a sea turtle.
Damon
Powernode, NAD M32, Cambridge CD transport, Analysis Plus, Nordost, iFi Nova, CSS Criton 1TDX, KEF C62
Vancouver, Canada
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Devialet Expert isn't good in showing secondary harmonics? - by Damon - 06-Apr-2016, 22:07

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)