01-May-2015, 14:42
(01-May-2015, 14:27)Dr Tone Wrote:(01-May-2015, 14:17)Hifi_swlon Wrote:Quote:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sibilant
I know what sibilant means…. I meant more the comment about it - I didn't understand it….
Lets just say I'm sceptical when it comes to most "audiophile" opinions on things. And maybe a little cynical as well by my post.
I suppose a lot of us are (me included - although the level generally fluctuates from 'a bit' to 'a lot'), but to be fair to the sibilant poster - it didn't seem any more or less valid than any of the other comments ranging from 'airy' to 'naturalness' to 'analogue' or even my 'less-soft'. For non-audio professionals (most of us I imagine), it's very difficult to try and describe sound and share your perception of it.
>>> 1st Place Award: Devialet, last decades most disappointing technology purchase. <<<