Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Stereo vs dual mono (250/800, 200/400)
#15
Hi All,

Well, I still stand to that the 400 is more fast, detailed, quiet, effortless dynamics, but the homogenous feeling is not there as with the 200. The only reason for this I feel is the link between the units or the way the companion treats the signal from the master.
I now run my companion as stereo 200 and this is also homogenous like the master, compared to the master it still has some running in.
There is something fishy with the linking business. Dev seem to know this as they fixed some 'latency' issues with the 7.1.1, well I thought 7.1.0 was better.
My next step is to try the bi-amping set-up and perhaps play around with the filter settings.

Will report back later/Mike
Ex D400 Now Aavik U-300/Feickert Woodpecker2-Kuzma 4P-Kondo silver-Benz LPS-Teddy Pardo PSU/Naim Unitiserve-Teddy Pardo PSU/SF Guarneri Homage/Whole system decoupled by Ansuz DTC/Cables from Ansuz, DYI and other commercial/Dedicated mains and spur-Lampizator SILK
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Stereo vs dual mono (250/800, 200/400) - by Mikeeo - 22-Aug-2014, 00:10

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)