04-Feb-2017, 09:15
I believe you are both right.
I have NOT heard a KEF LS50 wireless but had owned the LS50 for a fair bit.
I would have guessed that the LS50 would be better than the Silver in mids and trebles, but that the Gold would be better overall than the LS50. The Golds are substantially better than the Silver to my years though both pairs playing together to provide a bipole effect is still very fantastic - golds pointing forward for the main sound.
I would love to hear the LS50 wireless however just to see how far they have progressed for a pair of actives.
The LS50 does have subwoofer out which would be interesting to incorporate if you need the Phantom bass.
I have NOT heard a KEF LS50 wireless but had owned the LS50 for a fair bit.
I would have guessed that the LS50 would be better than the Silver in mids and trebles, but that the Gold would be better overall than the LS50. The Golds are substantially better than the Silver to my years though both pairs playing together to provide a bipole effect is still very fantastic - golds pointing forward for the main sound.
I would love to hear the LS50 wireless however just to see how far they have progressed for a pair of actives.
The LS50 does have subwoofer out which would be interesting to incorporate if you need the Phantom bass.
