Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
400 v 250
#14
(15-Jul-2014, 21:17)Confused Wrote: Has anyone tried bi-amping, rather than dual mono? Interesting to note that with the 250 / 800, this "looses" you 600w total, but with the 200 / 400, no watts are lost!

I remember a PMC guy at a show once advising against bi-amping, "just go for quality and power" was the gist of his advice. Probably very speaker dependent dependant this one, and you need two "master" amps, a slave won't work for bi-amping. So unlikely I know, but has anyone given it a try?

I think bi-amping with Devialets would only be worthwhile if you bypassed the passive crossovers in the speakers. So you would use the high/low-pass filters in the Devialets as active crossovers. This might be very interesting.

Otherwise I see no advantage in bi-amping.

Matt

Sonos Connect (W4S) > DSpeaker Antimode 2.0 > Sanders Magtech > Martin Logan Montis
Sonos Connect (W4S) > Devialet 200 > Vivid V1.5
Silver Phantoms (just the two)
London
Reply


Messages In This Thread
400 v 250 - by GuillaumeB - 27-May-2014, 11:17
RE: 400 v 250 - by Rufus McDufus - 27-May-2014, 17:43
RE: 400 v 250 - by Gavin @ Guildford Audio - 28-May-2014, 14:44
RE: 400 v 250 - by GuillaumeB - 28-May-2014, 22:16
RE: 400 v 250 - by ozthepoz - 29-May-2014, 20:56
RE: 400 v 250 - by BjornWiman - 30-May-2014, 09:35
RE: 400 v 250 - by f1eng - 08-Jun-2014, 13:11
RE: 400 v 250 - by Jml2155 - 11-Jun-2014, 04:08
RE: 400 v 250 - by BjornWiman - 13-Jun-2014, 23:26
RE: 400 v 250 - by Kunter - 14-Jun-2014, 05:15
RE: 400 v 250 - by Confused - 29-Jun-2014, 13:20
RE: 400 v 250 - by BjornWiman - 12-Jul-2014, 23:07
RE: 400 v 250 - by Confused - 15-Jul-2014, 21:17
RE: 400 v 250 - by Jwg1749 - 15-Jul-2014, 21:58
RE: 400 v 250 - by Mikeeo - 15-Jul-2014, 22:34
RE: 400 v 250 - by Confused - 17-Sep-2014, 21:36
RE: 400 v 250 - by Pim - 18-Sep-2014, 03:20

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)