Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
400 v 250
#15
Hi,

Bi amping would for sure be less as the amp in stereo mode will loose the advantage of the lowered jitter and background noise that the mono config gives. Not to forget that the mono versions also should have better power delivery response etc etc.
For me the added power didn't yield that much as the 200 could play very loud and with low distortion however the added clarity, blacker background and dynamic response were the things that made the 400 feel like a no brainer choice.

/Mike
Ex D400 Now Aavik U-300/Feickert Woodpecker2-Kuzma 4P-Kondo silver-Benz LPS-Teddy Pardo PSU/Naim Unitiserve-Teddy Pardo PSU/SF Guarneri Homage/Whole system decoupled by Ansuz DTC/Cables from Ansuz, DYI and other commercial/Dedicated mains and spur-Lampizator SILK
Reply


Messages In This Thread
400 v 250 - by GuillaumeB - 27-May-2014, 11:17
RE: 400 v 250 - by Rufus McDufus - 27-May-2014, 17:43
RE: 400 v 250 - by Gavin @ Guildford Audio - 28-May-2014, 14:44
RE: 400 v 250 - by GuillaumeB - 28-May-2014, 22:16
RE: 400 v 250 - by ozthepoz - 29-May-2014, 20:56
RE: 400 v 250 - by BjornWiman - 30-May-2014, 09:35
RE: 400 v 250 - by f1eng - 08-Jun-2014, 13:11
RE: 400 v 250 - by Jml2155 - 11-Jun-2014, 04:08
RE: 400 v 250 - by BjornWiman - 13-Jun-2014, 23:26
RE: 400 v 250 - by Kunter - 14-Jun-2014, 05:15
RE: 400 v 250 - by Confused - 29-Jun-2014, 13:20
RE: 400 v 250 - by BjornWiman - 12-Jul-2014, 23:07
RE: 400 v 250 - by Confused - 15-Jul-2014, 21:17
RE: 400 v 250 - by Jwg1749 - 15-Jul-2014, 21:58
RE: 400 v 250 - by Mikeeo - 15-Jul-2014, 22:34
RE: 400 v 250 - by Confused - 17-Sep-2014, 21:36
RE: 400 v 250 - by Pim - 18-Sep-2014, 03:20

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)