06-Feb-2015, 14:11
(06-Feb-2015, 13:59)ogs Wrote:(06-Feb-2015, 11:52)wikeeboy Wrote: I thought the review was not thorough at all. Pretty disappointing really seeing he supposedly had it for so long.
That is my thoughts too. The text appears to be more or less unfinished, as if he was in a hurry. At least compared to the Aries review or the Berkeley mentioned further up by Guillaume. Seems the Aries is not a good match for the Devialet amps?
Indeed, and in the review it states "during most of the review period I used the Auralic Aries as the music source component". Thus he is not testing Devialet AIR, which is how the amp is designed to be used with digital material, furthermore, it is reckoned that the Devialet sounds better via AIR than an Aries. So all a bit pointlless in many ways.
