Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
To Devialet or not to Devialet
#40
(26-Feb-2015, 09:12)Womaz Wrote: Ah my apologies, I have obviously misunderstood the messages. So this can be done on both the 120 and the 200?
Or i guess that depends on what i am connecting to the Devialet and whether there are enough outputs. It might be a good idea for me to hear that at my demo too.

It seems there are two schools of thought about headphones.  Vivialet pointed out they can be connected directly to the line-level outputs (with an adapter), but I'd be a little wary of that and would use a headphone amp in between.  My thinking is that the line outputs probably aren't designed to drive what might be a fairly low impedance, which means the quality of audio you'd get from directly-connected headphones could vary depending on the characteristics of the headphones you're using.  A headphone amp is designed for the job and should be a very easy load for the line outputs to drive, hence avoiding any possible loss of quality.
Roon (Mac Mini), Wilson Benesch Full Circle, Expert 1000 Pro CI, Kaiser Chiara
Warwickshire, UK
Reply


Messages In This Thread
To Devialet or not to Devialet - by Womaz - 25-Feb-2015, 14:23
RE: To Devialet or not to Devialet - by Womaz - 25-Feb-2015, 16:49
RE: To Devialet or not to Devialet - by Womaz - 25-Feb-2015, 17:55
RE: To Devialet or not to Devialet - by Ron D - 25-Feb-2015, 18:11
RE: To Devialet or not to Devialet - by Damon - 25-Feb-2015, 18:12
RE: To Devialet or not to Devialet - by Womaz - 25-Feb-2015, 20:20
RE: To Devialet or not to Devialet - by thumb5 - 25-Feb-2015, 20:25
RE: To Devialet or not to Devialet - by Womaz - 25-Feb-2015, 21:22
RE: To Devialet or not to Devialet - by Womaz - 25-Feb-2015, 21:35
RE: To Devialet or not to Devialet - by Womaz - 25-Feb-2015, 21:50
RE: To Devialet or not to Devialet - by Womaz - 25-Feb-2015, 22:25
RE: To Devialet or not to Devialet - by PhilP - 25-Feb-2015, 22:44
RE: To Devialet or not to Devialet - by Womaz - 25-Feb-2015, 22:47
RE: To Devialet or not to Devialet - by Womaz - 25-Feb-2015, 23:34
RE: To Devialet or not to Devialet - by Pim - 25-Feb-2015, 23:39
RE: To Devialet or not to Devialet - by Womaz - 25-Feb-2015, 23:46
RE: To Devialet or not to Devialet - by Pim - 26-Feb-2015, 08:15
RE: To Devialet or not to Devialet - by Womaz - 25-Feb-2015, 23:47
RE: To Devialet or not to Devialet - by Womaz - 26-Feb-2015, 09:12
RE: To Devialet or not to Devialet - by thumb5 - 26-Feb-2015, 09:55
RE: To Devialet or not to Devialet - by Womaz - 26-Feb-2015, 10:00
RE: To Devialet or not to Devialet - by Womaz - 26-Feb-2015, 09:15
RE: To Devialet or not to Devialet - by Womaz - 26-Feb-2015, 09:48
RE: To Devialet or not to Devialet - by Womaz - 26-Feb-2015, 10:21
RE: To Devialet or not to Devialet - by Womaz - 26-Feb-2015, 10:51
RE: To Devialet or not to Devialet - by Womaz - 26-Feb-2015, 16:20
RE: To Devialet or not to Devialet - by rwjr44 - 26-Feb-2015, 17:19
RE: To Devialet or not to Devialet - by Womaz - 26-Feb-2015, 18:17
RE: To Devialet or not to Devialet - by rwjr44 - 26-Feb-2015, 22:32
RE: To Devialet or not to Devialet - by Womaz - 26-Feb-2015, 21:27
RE: To Devialet or not to Devialet - by Womaz - 26-Feb-2015, 21:41
RE: To Devialet or not to Devialet - by Pim - 01-Apr-2015, 23:08
To Devialet or not to Devialet - by ledesc - 02-Apr-2015, 12:24
RE: To Devialet or not to Devialet - by Pim - 25-Feb-2015, 14:35
RE: To Devialet or not to Devialet - by Womaz - 25-Feb-2015, 14:50
RE: To Devialet or not to Devialet - by Womaz - 25-Feb-2015, 15:02
RE: To Devialet or not to Devialet - by brit - 25-Feb-2015, 15:04
To Devialet or not to Devialet - by Womaz - 25-Feb-2015, 15:55

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)