Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Auralic Aries vs Aurender X100 vs Melco N1Z
#48
(02-Mar-2015, 10:35)amabrok Wrote: FYI, Aurender now has Tidal integration but still in beta and it does not work properly. I hope that in time it will be as reliable as the rest of the operation of the Conductor App.

I agree with you regarding optical drives and the possible impact on sound quality but looking on how Melco and Aurender implemented built-in storage makes me confident that it is possible to have built-in storage without comprise on SQ

Having worked for a large s/w company in the past I'm definitely not interested in helping to de-bug s/w for my hi-fi Smile

If an HDD fails in an Aurender whats the procedure for replacing it?  Is this something that a consumer can do (including restoring from back-up) or does it have to go back to a dealer/manufacturer?  I would much prefer to have an external an HDD or SDD.

Thanks.
IMac macOS 10.15.3 (no link to Devialet Sad ) / MacBook Pro Retina OS X 10.14.4 / Linn LP12 / Devialet 200 Wilson Benesch Discovery. 
Qobuz Desktop Latest Version / Audirvana 3.2.18 / Audirvana Remote / iTunes 12.9 / AIR 3.0.4 / Wi-Fi / FW 8.1.0 / SAM 50%
Cambridge, UK (Updated 27th February, 2020)
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Auralic Aries vs Aurender X100 vs Melco N1Z - by PhilP - 02-Mar-2015, 10:42

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 6 Guest(s)