Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Auralic Aries vs Aurender X100 vs Melco N1Z
#62
I have no experience with Tidal, but my audiophile friends in the Netherlands report that it sounds not as good as their locally stored 16/44 FLAC files. I use Qobuz, and to my ears, the sound quality is really good. I hear no difference between Qobuz and locally stored FLAC files. I certainly don't experience any lack of liveliness (reported on Tidal by ears I trust).

That is then a good point of the Auralic Aries....... the Auralic Lightning DS app has Qobus integrated already.
NAS: LaCie Cloudbox
Streaming bridge: Auralic Aries
DAC/Amplifier: Devialet 200
Speakers: Magico S1
Digital cables: Audioquest Cinnamon
Loudspeaker cables: Vertere Pulse-X Mini
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Auralic Aries vs Aurender X100 vs Melco N1Z - by EricDH - 02-Mar-2015, 13:20

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 6 Guest(s)