Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Auralic Aries vs Aurender X100 vs Melco N1Z
#64
(02-Mar-2015, 13:34)GuillaumeB Wrote:
(02-Mar-2015, 13:20)EricDH Wrote: I have no experience with Tidal, but my audiophile friends in the Netherlands report that it sounds not as good as their locally stored 16/44 FLAC files. I use Qobuz, and to my ears, the sound quality is really good. I hear no difference between Qobuz and locally stored FLAC files. I certainly don't experience any lack of liveliness (reported on Tidal by ears I trust).

Wow that is really good to know Eric. Thanks!

I have Qobuz in Ipeng so will give that a go too and report back. I actually quite like the idea of Qobuz Sublime since I tend to buy quite a lot of 24bit material. Would pay for itself or certainly subsidise some of my online purchases.

Cheers

Guillaume

I concur. I tried both Qobuz and Tidal on my Macbook plus Air WiFi and for my ears Qobuz sounds better. Also Tidal suffers from more drop outs.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Aurender X100L / Transrotor Crescendo TT / Denon DCD1520 / Macbook Pro >> D400 >> Martin Logan Montis
amabrok's system - Latest update (May 2015, Page 11, Post #109)

Dubai, UAE
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Auralic Aries vs Aurender X100 vs Melco N1Z - by amabrok - 02-Mar-2015, 13:38

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)