Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Is there a big difference in sound the gold vs the reactor 900?
#11
If everything goes well i have two phantom golds tommorow,so lets see how they compete against my reactor 900 also in stereo
Reply
#12
(01-Apr-2021, 19:27)john2910 Wrote: If everything goes well i have two phantom golds tommorow,so lets see how they compete against my reactor 900 also in stereo

Any news?
Reply
#13
Sorry for the late reply..
But i traded the reactors 900 for the kefs lw50 wireless(version 1)

And i have the two phantom golds now.
The golds are better then the reactors indeed,its a more defined sound and a better and fuller sound(less boxy)

But the kefs are also realy realy good,ofcourse less bass but the sound is maybe even more refined and more hifi then the golds..But it needs a sub.. i do some more listening tests when i have the time.. And then i decide which one i keep at home..
Reply
#14
And the Kef LS50W version 2 is even better, i guess the combo Kef + Sub is a killer for less money, superior to the Golds.
But the design and WAF go to the Golds.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)