27-Sep-2016, 17:25
Question is : Is the Mutec better than AES/EBU ? is it possible to measure the gap in between ? not as a scientist of course but for a common ear
(27-Sep-2016, 17:25)jfp Wrote: [ -> ]Question is : Is the Mutec better than AES/EBU ? is it possible to measure the gap in between ? not as a scientist of course but for a common ear
(27-Sep-2016, 21:01)jfp Wrote: [ -> ]right Axel as I did not understand that Mutec had to be plugged into AES D input
Another question is the NAS reading speed. My QNAP 119 Turbo is 6 years old and works perfectly (44 khz or 192/24).
But it reads and write around 19 MO/S only.
A QNAP 251C for instance has 112 MB/s read & write speeds.
For audio use have you noticed an interest and difference with current NAS with their speed reading capacity ?
(26-Jul-2016, 07:26)cuco Wrote: [ -> ]I am also very unhappy to see this massive upgrade costs. I bought my unit after christmas last year. And now there is a big upgrade that cost more then half the price i paid. I feel like they are kidding me?!
My main interest is the streamer. But we need this hardware upgrade to be compatible. right?
Will the streamer cost extra money? or do we get it free when we upgrade now?
They should offer the 200 owners to upgrade to a new 250pro this would be a nice deal. then they can to with our old 200 whatever they like... but this is the worst deal ever.
(27-Sep-2016, 21:01)jfp Wrote: [ -> ]right Axel as I did not understand that Mutec had to be plugged into AES D input
Another question is the NAS reading speed. My QNAP 119 Turbo is 6 years old and works perfectly (44 khz or 192/24).
But it reads and write around 19 MO/S only.
A QNAP 251C for instance has 112 MB/s read & write speeds.
For audio use have you noticed an interest and difference with current NAS with their speed reading capacity ?
(04-Oct-2016, 09:49)jfp Wrote: [ -> ]something new and expected to be excellent. I wonder if it is as good as the Micro Rendu ? less expensive !Looks interesting, but you can't compare it to the MicroRendu as it has completely different functionality. My French isn't very good, but I can see that it has galvanic isolation. Does it re-clock the signal? If not, you may be better off going for the Intona USB isolator, which provides galvanic isolation and reclocks the signal. I used to have one before I bought the Mutec MC-3+ USB and it gave an easily audible improvement to the sound quality. One advantage of the Audiophonics unit is that it has a S/Pdif output which, IMO, is better sounding than the USB input on the Devialet.
http://www.audiophonics.fr/fr/appareils-...11412.html
what about the USB input on the devialet. Has it a galvanic isolation already ?
(04-Oct-2016, 09:49)jfp Wrote: [ -> ]something new and expected to be excellent. I wonder if it is as good as the Micro Rendu ? less expensive !
http://www.audiophonics.fr/fr/appareils-...11412.html
what about the USB input on the devialet. Has it a galvanic isolation already ?