+- Devialet Chat (https://devialetchat.com)
+-- Forum: Devialet Chat (https://devialetchat.com/Forum-Devialet-Chat)
+--- Forum: Streaming (https://devialetchat.com/Forum-Streaming)
+--- Thread: Why does playing over DLNA to my Devialet is working so bad? (/Thread-Why-does-playing-over-DLNA-to-my-Devialet-is-working-so-bad)
RE: Why does playing over DLNA to my Devialet is working so bad? - chrisc - 12-Aug-2018
JRiver's DNLA works with files up to 24 bit 96KHz. Above that it is unreliable, as you found
I now use a Cat7 cable between a MacBook and the amp with success
RE: Why does playing over DLNA to my Devialet is working so bad? - Manfred - 12-Aug-2018
(12-Aug-2018, 11:46)K4680 Wrote: Hello Manfred, the first time I would like to test with a LAN cable switch directly with the router zuverbinden. If that does not succeed, you can exclude the network as a source of error.
Do you use dynamic cross band repeating (2.4 + 5 GHz) by wlan bridge?
dynamic cross band repeating: yes.
To directly connect the router to the switch: I have a 15m Ethernet cable at home, but the latency would increase. I will test that during beginning next week.
RE: Why does playing over DLNA to my Devialet is working so bad? - Manfred - 12-Aug-2018
(12-Aug-2018, 15:05)Manfred Wrote:(12-Aug-2018, 11:46)K4680 Wrote: Hello Manfred, the first time I would like to test with a LAN cable switch directly with the router zuverbinden. If that does not succeed, you can exclude the network as a source of error.
Do you use dynamic cross band repeating (2.4 + 5 GHz) by wlan bridge?
dynamic cross band repeating: yes.
To directly connect the router to the switch: I have a 15m Ethernet cable at home, but the latency would increase. I will test that during beginning next week.
I tested it with the 15 m cable, a little better but not perfect. If one looks into task manager, the curve for ethernet workload using DLNA is a wild curve. The same file generates more or less a straight line if using AIR on my media renderer.
RE: Why does playing over DLNA to my Devialet is working so bad? - Manfred - 12-Aug-2018
(12-Aug-2018, 15:33)Manfred Wrote:(12-Aug-2018, 15:05)Manfred Wrote:(12-Aug-2018, 11:46)K4680 Wrote: Hello Manfred, the first time I would like to test with a LAN cable switch directly with the router zuverbinden. If that does not succeed, you can exclude the network as a source of error.
Do you use dynamic cross band repeating (2.4 + 5 GHz) by wlan bridge?
dynamic cross band repeating: yes.
To directly connect the router to the switch: I have a 15m Ethernet cable at home, but the latency would increase. I will test that during beginning next week.
I tested it with the 15 m cable, a little better but not perfect. If one looks into task manager, the curve for ethernet workload using DLNA is a wild curve. The same file generates more or less a straight line if using AIR on my media renderer.
I copied some album's locally to my media renderer (intel m.2 ssd, i3-6100, 8 GB RAM) and use the media renderer as DLNA server; MR->SWITCH->D200 Pro. It's less stuttering but in no way perfect.
RE: Why does playing over DLNA to my Devialet is working so bad? - K4680 - 12-Aug-2018
(12-Aug-2018, 15:55)Manfred Wrote:Hello Manfred, can create a small sketch of your wiring with router, switch wlan etc.(12-Aug-2018, 15:33)Manfred Wrote:(12-Aug-2018, 15:05)Manfred Wrote: dynamic cross band repeating: yes.
To directly connect the router to the switch: I have a 15m Ethernet cable at home, but the latency would increase. I will test that during beginning next week.
I tested it with the 15 m cable, a little better but not perfect. If one looks into task manager, the curve for ethernet workload using DLNA is a wild curve. The same file generates more or less a straight line if using AIR on my media renderer.
I copied some album's locally to my media renderer (intel m.2 ssd, i3-6100, 8 GB RAM) and use the media renderer as DLNA server; MR->SWITCH->D200 Pro. It's less stuttering but in no way perfect.
RE: Why does playing over DLNA to my Devialet is working so bad? - Manfred - 12-Aug-2018
(12-Aug-2018, 17:11)K4680 Wrote:(12-Aug-2018, 15:55)Manfred Wrote:Hello Manfred, can create a small sketch of your wiring with router, switch wlan etc.(12-Aug-2018, 15:33)Manfred Wrote: I tested it with the 15 m cable, a little better but not perfect. If one looks into task manager, the curve for ethernet workload using DLNA is a wild curve. The same file generates more or less a straight line if using AIR on my media renderer.
I copied some album's locally to my media renderer (intel m.2 ssd, i3-6100, 8 GB RAM) and use the media renderer as DLNA server; MR->SWITCH->D200 Pro. It's less stuttering but in no way perfect.
I have that, but if I want to insert an image it requires a http address?
RE: Why does playing over DLNA to my Devialet is working so bad? - Manfred - 12-Aug-2018
(12-Aug-2018, 20:19)Manfred Wrote:(12-Aug-2018, 17:11)K4680 Wrote:(12-Aug-2018, 15:55)Manfred Wrote: I copied some album's locally to my media renderer (intel m.2 ssd, i3-6100, 8 GB RAM) and use the media renderer as DLNA server; MR->SWITCH->D200 Pro. It's less stuttering but in no way perfect.Hello Manfred, can create a small sketch of your wiring with router, switch wlan etc.
I have that, but if I want to insert an image it requires a http address?
You find them in JRMC forum (I have asked the same question there):
MY D220 Pro Environment
I did another test:
MC DLNA SERVER (Windows 10, separate room 36 TB Disk Space)->Switch (Linksys)->Ethernet->LG 4K TV | DLNA Renderer ->optical->Devialet D220 Pro.
That works without any problems, even with 24 bit 192kHz! I think it is the Devialet CI Module causing the problems?
RE: Why does playing over DLNA to my Devialet is working so bad? - K4680 - 12-Aug-2018
(12-Aug-2018, 20:23)Manfred Wrote:(12-Aug-2018, 20:19)Manfred Wrote:(12-Aug-2018, 17:11)K4680 Wrote: Hello Manfred, can create a small sketch of your wiring with router, switch wlan etc.
I have that, but if I want to insert an image it requires a http address?
You find them in JRMC forum (I have asked the same question there):
MY D220 Pro Environment
I did another test:
MC DLNA SERVER (Windows 10, separate room 36 TB Disk Space)->Switch (Linksys)->Ethernet->LG 4K TV | DLNA Renderer ->optical->Devialet D220 Pro.
That works without any problems, even with 24 bit 192kHz! I think it is the Devialet CI Module causing the problems?
Hi, what I notice is the switch is a managed switch. These switches have various settings about which one can stumble, I've already happened! Can one swap the switch against a normal switch for the test? Would be worth a try!
RE: Why does playing over DLNA to my Devialet is working so bad? - Axel - 13-Aug-2018
(12-Aug-2018, 20:19)Manfred Wrote:@Manfred. No, use the reply button. Below, you will see a button labelled "New Attachment" choose the location of your file, then press the "Add Attachment" button on the right. You can then use the "Insert Into Post"(12-Aug-2018, 17:11)K4680 Wrote:(12-Aug-2018, 15:55)Manfred Wrote: I copied some album's locally to my media renderer (intel m.2 ssd, i3-6100, 8 GB RAM) and use the media renderer as DLNA server; MR->SWITCH->D200 Pro. It's less stuttering but in no way perfect.Hello Manfred, can create a small sketch of your wiring with router, switch wlan etc.
I have that, but if I want to insert an image it requires a http address?
button, also on the right.
RE: Why does playing over DLNA to my Devialet is working so bad? - ogs - 13-Aug-2018
I had too little time on Sunday, but I managed to get some testing done. I actually had the exact same experience as @Confused (in post 5). A bit of stuttering some times and complete silence for 3-5 seconds on a few occasions. Sound quality was quite good, especially midrange. Gapless didn't work which is a deal breaker for me. If gapless worked I'd do more testing as that midrange quality would be nice to have! I still suspect that Audirvana has better sound overall than the setup I tried. As I use Windows 7 I couldn't get the trial of Audirvana to run. The Windows version is beta anyway and has yet to have remote control. @ada may be right that UPnP sounds very good, but it depends on which software is used.