Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Mutec Ref-10
#6
(24-Aug-2017, 19:03)zdenes Wrote: Swissbear, I totally understand you not understanding why/how the SMS-200 ultra can be improved by re-clocking. Neither do I but there seems to be a general view that the ultra is better than the original and the main difference is the sCLK-ex clock added. In fact, I witnessed a conversation between Mr. Peters in Munich and Mr. Kim (maybe it's his first name) of SOtM in Munich where they were talking about adding a 10MHz input option into the ultra so that it can accommodate the Ref10. I guess the two of them have quite some knowledge between them, probably not just a marketing gimmick.
Let's hope somebody here or over on the CA forum will be able to test it.
Zoltan

I guess we are on the same page Smile. I will share my conclusions with you if I can arrange such a test.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Mutec Ref-10 - by SwissBear - 24-Aug-2017, 14:46
Mutec Ref-10 - by zdenes - 24-Aug-2017, 16:28
RE: Mutec Ref-10 - by SwissBear - 24-Aug-2017, 16:42
RE: Mutec Ref-10 - by zdenes - 24-Aug-2017, 19:03
RE: Mutec Ref-10 - by SwissBear - 24-Aug-2017, 21:16
RE: Mutec Ref-10 - by Confused - 24-Aug-2017, 17:18
RE: Mutec Ref-10 - by Confused - 25-Aug-2017, 07:55
RE: Mutec Ref-10 - by zdenes - 25-Aug-2017, 09:07
RE: Mutec Ref-10 - by SwissBear - 25-Aug-2017, 09:46
RE: Mutec Ref-10 - by zdenes - 25-Aug-2017, 11:49
RE: Mutec Ref-10 - by baconbrain - 29-Aug-2017, 10:51
RE: Mutec Ref-10 - by Confused - 29-Aug-2017, 13:11
RE: Mutec Ref-10 - by baconbrain - 29-Aug-2017, 14:02
RE: Mutec Ref-10 - by Confused - 29-Aug-2017, 15:44
RE: Mutec Ref-10 - by baconbrain - 29-Aug-2017, 18:42
RE: Mutec Ref-10 - by Confused - 29-Aug-2017, 20:16

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)