Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Audio Science Review of Expert 200.
(17-Apr-2020, 15:30)Gerronwithit Wrote:
(17-Apr-2020, 13:24)petrik Wrote: It's all good that you like the product that you purchased @ssfas. Enjoy!

I wouldn't like this thread to become objective vs subjective debate since it's quite pointless as we have seen in many other forums. I'm sure most of us agree that Devialet Expert sounds and looks just fine (subjective evaluation).

I'm still concerned about the measurements done by ASR (that is one of the main subjects of this thread, right?).
When ASR carries out his own subjective, imperfect tests using potentially defective equipment with no prior authorisation or participation by Devialet and prints his findings as authoritative then ASR deserves no credibility at all.

Yes I agree if ASR would be the only one getting these results. But we have seen quite similar measurement results on the Stereophile and Miller Audio Research. Are you suggesting that all of them are not capable of measuring the Devialet Expert properly? That can be of course possible.
Bluesound Node > Matrix Audio X-SPDIF 2 > Genelec 8351B & 7360A
Devialet 1000 Pro
Bluesound Node 2i > Genelec 8330
Tampere, Finland
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Audio Science Review of Expert 200. - by ragwo - 30-Mar-2020, 16:30
RE: Au - by kerkhoffd - 30-Mar-2020, 16:38
RE: Au - by ragwo - 30-Mar-2020, 17:10
RE: Audio Science Review of Expert 200. - by petrik - 17-Apr-2020, 16:01

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)