Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Audio Science Review of Expert 200.
(16-May-2020, 09:06)Rufus McDufus Wrote: Slightly confusingly though the plot done by Amir after the unit was repaired (https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum...ost-399323) looks to be on the optical input as opposed to the USB input show (left graph on @Confused 's post above. Ideally though, there shouldn't be a lot of difference between the two inputs.  I guess that does show the optical input isn't too shabby though.

Good spot Rufus!  Checking back at ASR, I see that you are absolutely right.  So, this gives us a comparison of two different inputs, with a degree of doubt as to if the amp tested via USB was working correctly.  Difficult to reach a definitive conclusion from that!  Interesting though, maybe the optical input does actually have lower noise versus the USB input? No reason why not.

Maybe Amir is confused?  Now there is a disturbing thought. Sad
1000 Pro - KEF Blade - iFi Zen Stream - Mutec REF10 - MC3+USB - Pro-Ject Signature 12
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Audio Science Review of Expert 200. - by ragwo - 30-Mar-2020, 16:30
RE: Au - by kerkhoffd - 30-Mar-2020, 16:38
RE: Au - by ragwo - 30-Mar-2020, 17:10
RE: Audio Science Review of Expert 200. - by Confused - 16-May-2020, 10:34

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)