Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Does SAM and Martin Logan make sense?
#1
Folks
I am running the Dev 170/200 with ML Ethos Speakers for nearly a year now and have spent a lot of time and effort to optimize it with cables (LS, Power, Digital etc.) and I think it is really a fascinating combination - far from whatever I have owned in the past 20 yrs (and this was decent high end stuff as well). However sometimes - depending on the recording - it can be a bit too direct and particularly with voices or strings a bit harsh.
What I find a bit astonishing is the fact that obviously many ML Owners have voted for SAM. To my underswtanding (I am not a technical expert) so far SAM only influences the bass, which in most MLs is active - meaning controlled by the speaker. So have I missed something - could SAM improve the MLs as well? Looking forward to comments and opinions.
Dev 200 - Martin Logan Ethos - Inakustik LS1603 Speaker Cables - Linn Ikemi CD, Auralic Aries, WIN10 LapTop. Project Xperience Acryl with Ortofon Bronze 2M. Sonos Connect, Tidal High-Res Abo
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Does SAM and Martin Logan make sense? - by Hyperhenry - 26-Jun-2014, 12:25

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)