09-Jun-2015, 05:14
(This post was last modified: 09-Jun-2015, 05:31 by MountainGuy.)
Just read through the conversation at the bottom of this page.
http://www.digitalaudioreview.net/2015/0...-ces-2015/
A number of them auditioned the Phantom and made comments. None seemed to be greatly pleased. It's quite a conundrum really - some rave in other threads , but others pan it. One of the more interesting statement was the claim that Devialet had originally promoted the Phantom to be better than the KEF Blade 2. Really? THAT is quite a claim if so.
Anyways, not being negative - simply adding to the dialogue from as many people as possible.
MtnGuy
http://www.digitalaudioreview.net/2015/0...-ces-2015/
A number of them auditioned the Phantom and made comments. None seemed to be greatly pleased. It's quite a conundrum really - some rave in other threads , but others pan it. One of the more interesting statement was the claim that Devialet had originally promoted the Phantom to be better than the KEF Blade 2. Really? THAT is quite a claim if so.
Anyways, not being negative - simply adding to the dialogue from as many people as possible.
MtnGuy
