25-Jun-2015, 20:38
(25-Jun-2015, 19:01)Dvlt PhD Wrote:(25-Jun-2015, 17:35)streamy Wrote:(25-Jun-2015, 11:06)stonedragon Wrote: I say that is a pretty good endorsement - especially this quote...
Question deux: Does the Phantom sound as good as an Editor’s Choice $50,000 stereo system, featuring a gaggle of components, oxygen-free python cables, and monolith speakers? No. But the disparity isn’t a chasm; it’s more like a small gap.
So to naysayers... what say you?
From my personal experience my B&W's didn't stand a chance and 3 months on, I don't regret my purchase. Not ONE BIT!!
I second this, 100% same with me!
Hi stonedragon; streamy
What B&W's versions are you both referring to, please? It'd be good to know.
Regarding the quote from the review, I guess it's a good idea to make less expensive version, because the idea of having to spend $10K in a surround system, it's not a good feeling. Like another said, for rear it'd be good, apparently...
Hello mate. I had the B&W 803D's, with music fidelity 550K superchargers attached. My whole rig was about 10K. Sounded great, but these little beauties are in another leauge in so many ways. I can't praise them high enough. I have 3 at the moment and movies sound fantastic. I don't have any lip syn issues.
