Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Stereo vs dual mono (250/800, 200/400)
#10
(17-Aug-2014, 10:05)Kunter Wrote: Mike,

I mean: make the slave "master" for a change Smile

They may even like the role play...

If you are using anything other than wireless, it should be possible...

Hi, as I am writing this my slave is officially a master! Yes I do not use the wifi at all as I stream from my Naim dig out into the Dev.
It is clear that the slave sounds a bit different, not tonally though. I would characterize it as a slimmer sound and slightly less 3D, more confined in the loudspeakers. Perhaps I would say it is held back and doesn't bloom as much as the master. There is also a slight less tightness to the sound. I guess I have some 300 hours on the slave. Right now I try to remember if the master 200 sounded the same before bedding in but it is hard because down the road my 170 became a 200 and that jump was very big in SQ.

/Mike
Ex D400 Now Aavik U-300/Feickert Woodpecker2-Kuzma 4P-Kondo silver-Benz LPS-Teddy Pardo PSU/Naim Unitiserve-Teddy Pardo PSU/SF Guarneri Homage/Whole system decoupled by Ansuz DTC/Cables from Ansuz, DYI and other commercial/Dedicated mains and spur-Lampizator SILK
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Stereo vs dual mono (250/800, 200/400) - by Mikeeo - 17-Aug-2014, 10:23

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)