27-Nov-2016, 11:54
(26-Nov-2016, 23:54)Phoenix Wrote: Dear Yaba, don't forget a remastering has to take on original tapes and you can't "make" what it is not on the original tape. Can I suggest you to compare the Elgar for example with the Testament release? Or the Brahms with the original Supraphon release? Anyway, we are always pleased to hear some feedbacks from music lovers!
No I didn't forget about what is 'left' on the original tape...it was actually my question to you and now I assume there isn't much more details left on the originial tape.
Sorry, I don't have the suggested recordings at hand to compare. What is your opinion about them. Are they poorly mastered or are they very 'raw' material, mostly untouched?
I presume that you have to take compromises while remastering a tape recording as it comes to sough, crackles and the like in context with maintaining all the details of the music?
My own liking is to have all the details available while the 'analogue artefacts' come second within remastering.
I'll try to get a copy of the suggested files to compare though.
gui
"Oh, you can buy the other. But then it is a cost intensive learning process"
berlin
