06-Mar-2017, 08:50
(This post was last modified: 06-Mar-2017, 09:00 by maxijazz.
Edit Reason: added PS
)
I would not worry about Peachtree, if would be one of the persons who upgraded to Pro version:
1) it was common praise, that upgrade to Pro was worth the money (which was more than price of Peachtree 300)
2) old, poor D200 (
) was used with LS50
3) we don't know if SAM was used with KEFs
4) we all know, that little better sound (and D200 was more finessed) might require spending much more money
5) D200 supports lower impedance of speakers (and if i remember more power into 4Ohms than Peachtree)
6) D200 gives opportunity to upgrade to Pro or dual mono. That must be worth something
Are we better now?
PS. Did i say that Pro owners will get new uPnP/DLNA card worth almost Nova 300?
1) it was common praise, that upgrade to Pro was worth the money (which was more than price of Peachtree 300)
2) old, poor D200 (
) was used with LS50 3) we don't know if SAM was used with KEFs
4) we all know, that little better sound (and D200 was more finessed) might require spending much more money
5) D200 supports lower impedance of speakers (and if i remember more power into 4Ohms than Peachtree)
6) D200 gives opportunity to upgrade to Pro or dual mono. That must be worth something
Are we better now?
PS. Did i say that Pro owners will get new uPnP/DLNA card worth almost Nova 300?
Fanless HdPlex (HQPlayer) -> Merging Hapi -> Genelec 8351B
