Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
130 pro + KEF LS50 vs KEF LS50 Wireless
#7
(28-Mar-2018, 05:11)wikeeboy Wrote: Funny how we all have different takes on things Smile

There has been much talk about the active LS50 DSP engine providing much better bass in the wireless (active) version compared to the passives. So i assume the OP is asking to compare a devialet powered passive LS50 with SAM, to the self sufficient active version of the LS50's (wireless).

I'm picking my active LS50's up in a couple of hours.

Sorry if I wasn't too clear guys Smile. Correct, keen to see if the DSP/Bass in the wireless version, can really match the effect SAM has on the bass with a 130 and passives.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: 130 pro + KEF LS50 vs KEF LS50 Wireless - by blodsbror - 28-Mar-2018, 23:39

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)