21-Jul-2018, 09:22
(This post was last modified: 21-Jul-2018, 09:29 by Hifi_swlon.)
The reason they aren’t making any other shapes/sizes/redesigned dialogues - is because it’s far more expensive to do that than keep rehashing the electronics in existing shells.
When you read historical articles on how much r&d they did to create phantom, they probably underestimated how long it would take to recoup the money in sales (they probably overestimated how much of a market there is for strange looking expensive Bluetooth speakers - which is kind of how they market them).
New sizes mean, new design and manufacture, new testing, new packaging, etc etc. All expensive.
Probably better they try and make them work properly so they don’t go down in history as a company that had groundbreaking products but went out of business because of hyperbole and poor performance (not in sound terms)
When you read historical articles on how much r&d they did to create phantom, they probably underestimated how long it would take to recoup the money in sales (they probably overestimated how much of a market there is for strange looking expensive Bluetooth speakers - which is kind of how they market them).
New sizes mean, new design and manufacture, new testing, new packaging, etc etc. All expensive.
Probably better they try and make them work properly so they don’t go down in history as a company that had groundbreaking products but went out of business because of hyperbole and poor performance (not in sound terms)
>>> 1st Place Award: Devialet, last decades most disappointing technology purchase. <<<
