Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Using Devialet's active cross-over
#6
(15-Dec-2014, 15:01)amabrok Wrote:
(15-Dec-2014, 13:05)Jwg1749 Wrote: Ironically it seems the way forward for selling active crossovers to the public is to market active speakers as lifestyle products. No clumsy great amps, no speaker cables trailing across your living room: just a digital source communicating via one cable (or even wirelessly) with the little amp/DAC packs inside your nice slim speakers.

As far as SQ is concerned, whilst I agree that passive crossovers are a bad thing, for my money they don’t rank in the top three bottlenecks in speaker design. For me the top three SQ bottlenecks are: 1. cabinets, with their boxy, resonant character; 2. electrodynamic drivers and their problems with inertia; 3. using any crossover at all, active or passive (full range, please!).

Matt

hence the brilliance of the ML Montis Idea Big Grin

Busted! Blush

Sonos Connect (W4S) > DSpeaker Antimode 2.0 > Sanders Magtech > Martin Logan Montis
Sonos Connect (W4S) > Devialet 200 > Vivid V1.5
Silver Phantoms (just the two)
London
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Using Devialet's active cross-over - by Jwg1749 - 15-Dec-2014, 16:23

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)