@RJHD3 - to answer your original question, yes, I am more than happy with my dual mono, I have had zero issues with it. That said, I am aware of the current configurator bugs, and to be honest there are some minor configuration changes that I would like to make, but my current configurations is working just fine, I am leaving this until Devialet fix the bugs.
As for your debate between the 210 Pro and 220 Pro, this is an interesting dilemma. There are some differences in the electronics between the two, and per the link below there is some evidence that even with the extra power excepted, the 220 is the better of the two, it appears to have slightly lower noise. That said, the dual mono units are supposedly superior as the dual mono configuration provides lower distortion.
https://devialetchat.com/Thread-Audio-Sc...3#pid92433
This leads to the question, which sounds best? There is no way of answering that one, if possible the ideal approach would be to try them both in your room, with your speakers, and your ears. Maybe this is not possible?
If it was me, with no possibility to audition, I would go for the 220 Pro. (assuming the cost to change is similar) The reason being it should perform more or less the same as the 210 Pro, but with the simplicity of the single box. In addition, the 220 Pro offers a future upgrade path. Who knows, one day in the future you might have some new power hungry speakers, and by then a 220 Pro as a companion might be relatively affordable. Lots of assumptions there, but at least the 220 Pro route provides this option. Another consideration might be if the additional inputs that you get with the dual mono are of any use to you, but this may not be a factor in your case.
As for your debate between the 210 Pro and 220 Pro, this is an interesting dilemma. There are some differences in the electronics between the two, and per the link below there is some evidence that even with the extra power excepted, the 220 is the better of the two, it appears to have slightly lower noise. That said, the dual mono units are supposedly superior as the dual mono configuration provides lower distortion.
https://devialetchat.com/Thread-Audio-Sc...3#pid92433
This leads to the question, which sounds best? There is no way of answering that one, if possible the ideal approach would be to try them both in your room, with your speakers, and your ears. Maybe this is not possible?
If it was me, with no possibility to audition, I would go for the 220 Pro. (assuming the cost to change is similar) The reason being it should perform more or less the same as the 210 Pro, but with the simplicity of the single box. In addition, the 220 Pro offers a future upgrade path. Who knows, one day in the future you might have some new power hungry speakers, and by then a 220 Pro as a companion might be relatively affordable. Lots of assumptions there, but at least the 220 Pro route provides this option. Another consideration might be if the additional inputs that you get with the dual mono are of any use to you, but this may not be a factor in your case.
1000 Pro - KEF Blade - iFi Zen Stream - Mutec REF10 - MC3+USB - Pro-Ject Signature 12
