Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Dante, Atmos and Arvus H1-D
#20
(15-Sep-2023, 17:18)Yondu Wrote:
(15-Sep-2023, 00:40)njaiswal Wrote: Thanks for the info Yondu.  :-).  Even with the above configurations, there will be latency differences between the two models.  They'll be off somewhere between 2-5ms.  That's normally not an issue for stereo but for atmos it makes a difference.  In my experience, almost all atmos processors assume that there is almost no latency with the speakers and don't compensate for it if it exists.

Latency between Phantom 1 (optical direct mode with Dantestick) and Phantom 2 custom will be nearly the same (as Devialet shows it in tradeshows). On multicast they recommend (in relation with the manufacturer of the Dolby/DTS processor/decoder) to set Dante/AES67 latency to 5ms. When i've listened to it I do not experienced issues on dolby atmos or DTS:X contents. I suppose also that the room calibration solution (depending on manufacturer, Dirac, REWS or Room Perfect) is there to compensate delay and gain. No ?

(15-Sep-2023, 17:22)Yondu Wrote:
(15-Sep-2023, 17:18)Yondu Wrote:
(15-Sep-2023, 00:40)njaiswal Wrote: Thanks for the info Yondu.  :-).  Even with the above configurations, there will be latency differences between the two models.  They'll be off somewhere between 2-5ms.  That's normally not an issue for stereo but for atmos it makes a difference.  In my experience, almost all atmos processors assume that there is almost no latency with the speakers and don't compensate for it if it exists.

Latency between Phantom 1 (optical direct mode with Dantestick) and Phantom 2 custom will be nearly the same (as Devialet shows it in tradeshows). On multicast they recommend (in relation with the manufacturer of the Dolby/DTS processor/decoder) to set Dante/AES67 latency to 5ms. When i've listened to it I do not experienced issues on dolby atmos or DTS:X contents. I suppose also that the room calibration solution (depending on manufacturer, Dirac, REWS or Room Perfect) is there to compensate delay and gain. No ?

Thanks for sharing. Maybe the current set of processors are able to take into account the differences in latency between the models. :-)

Network latency and QOS priorization could help (in particular with Dante networks) because this AoIP solution is working on layer 3 (OSI Model) instead of layer 2 (like AVB).
QoS is an option if you're running multiple VLANs on a switch. I just have a separate switch for my dante network. keeps everything simple...
6 x Phantom Gold, 3 x Phantom Silver, 2 x Phantom Classic, 9 x Phantom Reactor 900, Symetrix Radius AEC-2, 2 x JBL Synthesis SDP-55, Dante
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Dante, Atmos and Arvus H1-D - by booshtukka - 17-Jul-2023, 13:39
RE: Dante, Atmos and Arvus H1-D - by Snoopy8 - 18-Jul-2023, 01:00
RE: Dante, Atmos and Arvus H1-D - by Snoopy8 - 18-Jul-2023, 13:17
RE: Dante, Atmos and Arvus H1-D - by Yondu - 04-Sep-2023, 13:50
RE: Dante, Atmos and Arvus H1-D - by Yondu - 07-Sep-2023, 09:40
RE: Dante, Atmos and Arvus H1-D - by njaiswal - 11-Sep-2023, 11:22
RE: Dante, Atmos and Arvus H1-D - by Yondu - 11-Sep-2023, 17:44
RE: Dante, Atmos and Arvus H1-D - by njaiswal - 13-Sep-2023, 18:14
RE: Dante, Atmos and Arvus H1-D - by Yondu - 14-Sep-2023, 02:37
RE: Dante, Atmos and Arvus H1-D - by njaiswal - 15-Sep-2023, 00:40
RE: Dante, Atmos and Arvus H1-D - by Yondu - 15-Sep-2023, 17:18
RE: Dante, Atmos and Arvus H1-D - by Yondu - 15-Sep-2023, 17:22
RE: Dante, Atmos and Arvus H1-D - by njaiswal - 19-Sep-2023, 02:22
RE: Dante, Atmos and Arvus H1-D - by Snoopy8 - 01-Oct-2023, 07:50
RE: Dante, Atmos and Arvus H1-D - by Yondu - 12-Oct-2023, 17:47
RE: Dante, Atmos and Arvus H1-D - by Yondu - 16-May-2024, 13:10
RE: Dante, Atmos and Arvus H1-D - by Yondu - 17-May-2024, 08:32

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)