30-Sep-2015, 18:50
(This post was last modified: 30-Sep-2015, 18:50 by Hifi_swlon.)
(30-Sep-2015, 18:37)Antoine Wrote: Haha, I've read it too and have even been stupid enough to make two posts in that topic. It's the classic subjectivist vs objectivist discussion thus far. Nothing to do with "science" yet which they aimed for.
Haha you're brave!
I've not read much on that site, and now I know why - I don't think I'll venture back in hurry (apart from to snoop on that thread for the amusement).
It didn't seem very scientific as despite the authors claims - the thread title had the word 'review' in it for a start which kind of sets the precedent. Not sure if he has an axe to grind or what but it seems like the object was to show that it didn't work by any scientific means possible. I've got a degree in Physics but no nothing about DAC design or electronics so wont chime in - but the way he dealt with any criticisms didn't seem like he was remotely a scientist. He just came across more like an arrogant individual that likes an argument.
Still, it's entertaining.
I suppose at least I know I don't need to use my ears now to test it when mine comes - by his reasoning, I've already ben brainwashed into 'knowing' that ti works despite it 'doing nothing'. We'll see….
>>> 1st Place Award: Devialet, last decades most disappointing technology purchase. <<<