31-Mar-2015, 19:50
G et al,
I would say that connecting the mono units by the RCA-XLR set up is a winner compared to the RCA-RCA. As my own findings together with others with Audioprana and other cables seem to support this. My own experience from my diy RCA-XLR cable has been positive and now of late when running a construction from Cabledyne with even less latency which was a step to bring me back in stereo mode D200, channel coherence that is.
As I said, using the AES/EBU input on the companion is the main winner, then finding the right cable to reduce latency will of course complete everything.
More tests and experiences please!
/Mike
I would say that connecting the mono units by the RCA-XLR set up is a winner compared to the RCA-RCA. As my own findings together with others with Audioprana and other cables seem to support this. My own experience from my diy RCA-XLR cable has been positive and now of late when running a construction from Cabledyne with even less latency which was a step to bring me back in stereo mode D200, channel coherence that is.
As I said, using the AES/EBU input on the companion is the main winner, then finding the right cable to reduce latency will of course complete everything.
More tests and experiences please!
/Mike
Ex D400 Now Aavik U-300/Feickert Woodpecker2-Kuzma 4P-Kondo silver-Benz LPS-Teddy Pardo PSU/Naim Unitiserve-Teddy Pardo PSU/SF Guarneri Homage/Whole system decoupled by Ansuz DTC/Cables from Ansuz, DYI and other commercial/Dedicated mains and spur-Lampizator SILK