13-Jul-2015, 15:53
I too read the review by exploring the whole issue. (digital copy) While I don't have a critical spirit, I was critically assessing the entire issue. To me, the magazine seem primarily to be about marketing whatever they were reviewing. There were numerous reviews and almost all five stars ratings. It seems that only a couple were 4 1/2 stars. Everything they reviewed were wonderful. As to the Phantoms, the impression I have is that they are particularly enamored by the lower frequencies as that was mentioned three times. The highs were mentioned as being laid back or something along those lines. The two other active systems mentioned were not really compared in any specifics - just generalities that gave no data. In all, for me, the review did not give confidence to objectivity of the article.
MtnGuy
MtnGuy
