Thumb5-
Nor did I but having been around forums awhile I saw the potential for it and wanted to head it off at the pass.
I personally know of nary a single "irreversible" change in the itenerary and of course 'invasive' is part and parcel to the project. When omelette is on the menu going invasive on eggs is required. Neither a right, wrong, good, bad, here nor there thing... just the way it is. I believe I have been exceedingly objective in expectations to a fault. Readily admitting at every opportunity this could be better, about the same or worse as that relates to SQ or temperatures. No guarantees! I can do no better at that. There's little reason to challenge my assertions when I'm continually proffering possible improvement, possible no-change and possible worse conditions on all aspects of this in multiple posts each day. You're simply repeating what I've already said. Seems a bit of "the department of redundancy department" to me. But s'ok and if you forget sometimes I'll try to remind you ;-)
I'm unsure SQ enhancements can be verified in any certified or bona fide way. But then again its not my job to verify the results but moreover to simply pass them along as best I can in an as honest and objective way I know how. I have no reason to embellish as there's nothing to be gained by me for doing that. If it works that is my reward. However it turns out I'll tell you. Verification then becomes your responsibility. You want to hear it? Make the plane reservation! But let me repeat unless someone missed it then you can reaffirm... it could turn out the better, the same or worse than before I started.
Nor did I but having been around forums awhile I saw the potential for it and wanted to head it off at the pass.
I personally know of nary a single "irreversible" change in the itenerary and of course 'invasive' is part and parcel to the project. When omelette is on the menu going invasive on eggs is required. Neither a right, wrong, good, bad, here nor there thing... just the way it is. I believe I have been exceedingly objective in expectations to a fault. Readily admitting at every opportunity this could be better, about the same or worse as that relates to SQ or temperatures. No guarantees! I can do no better at that. There's little reason to challenge my assertions when I'm continually proffering possible improvement, possible no-change and possible worse conditions on all aspects of this in multiple posts each day. You're simply repeating what I've already said. Seems a bit of "the department of redundancy department" to me. But s'ok and if you forget sometimes I'll try to remind you ;-)
I'm unsure SQ enhancements can be verified in any certified or bona fide way. But then again its not my job to verify the results but moreover to simply pass them along as best I can in an as honest and objective way I know how. I have no reason to embellish as there's nothing to be gained by me for doing that. If it works that is my reward. However it turns out I'll tell you. Verification then becomes your responsibility. You want to hear it? Make the plane reservation! But let me repeat unless someone missed it then you can reaffirm... it could turn out the better, the same or worse than before I started.
Statements in my posts are opinion only, not to be construed as fact. Any projects I engage in are at my own risk! Their outcome cannot be assured and may result in success, small/no change or catastrophic failure. I encourage no one rely on anything I say or do as gospel and to realize your mileage may vary!
