07-Jan-2015, 20:49
(07-Jan-2015, 01:38)kenreau Wrote:(06-Jan-2015, 19:04)marcbrown Wrote: So far with my 200 I have gotten far better sound using a Halide Bridge usb to SPDIF converter which is feed by an Aqvox external power supply. I tried a couple of expensive usb cables (Cardas and AQ) and went directly to Devialet using software from site, but none came close. The difference is immediately noticeable for myself and wife. I know this adds an extra step but by getting the computer out of direct connection to the Devialet is well worth it. I notice Berkeley Audio recommends using their usb to SPDIF with the TOL set-up they have also. I have considered testing the Berkeley usb to SPDIF but have not felt the need. I hope to test one day.
This is an interesting topic to read. Marc, what is your music server / source? I currently use a mac mini and was considering trying a USB to SPDIF convertor until I picked up a TotalDAC USB filtered cable.
I also have a Mac mini with max memory and SS hard drive. I had the Halide Bridge from previous stereo. When I bought the 200 I figured the best would be the usb direct. After getting the Cardas and AQ cables and loading software off website testing began. I went back and forth multiple times. The Bridge was an easy choice (air, fluidity,detail). Since sorting this out I read the recent review of the TOL Berkeley DAC ( appr $18000) by Robert Harley. In that column Berkeley recommends using their usb to SPDIF convertor (appr. $2500) for far better sound. They feel the extra step is far better due to computer and it's inherent noise. My ears agree. Hope that helps some.
