Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Why is digital audio so complicated? Where did it all go wrong?
#37
(29-Feb-2016, 18:11)Antoine Wrote:
(29-Feb-2016, 17:58)f1eng Wrote: I suppose the magnitude of these differences are described differently by different people.

True, I also realize this and I'm sure most people will find no fault with using ethernet, WiFi or USB. Ethernet is actually very decent sounding although USB can sound even better with tweaks.

I myself (and of course others like me) am the "problem" here in my "perfectionists quest" to always try to improve on things. It's hard to go back though knowing things can be made significantly better than they already are. Also everone attaches a different value to these improvements. I'm sure quite a lot of us couldn't be bothered while I value these improvements very, very much. Smile

Fair enough. I value improvements quite a bit too, I have never owned a hifi worth less than my car, for example, but if the choice arose I would still sooner listen to music I love on my portable than music which I am not fond of on my hifi.
Devialet Original d'Atelier 44 Core, Job Pre/225, Goldmund PH2, Goldmund Reference/T3f /Ortofon A90, Goldmund Mimesis 36+ & Chord Blu, iMac/Air, Lynx Theta, Tune Audio Anima, Goldmund Epilog 1&2, REL Studio. Dialog, Silver Phantoms, Branch stands, copper cables (mainly).
Oxfordshire

Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Why is digital audio so complicated? Where did it all go wrong? - by f1eng - 29-Feb-2016, 20:45

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)