29-Jul-2016, 13:37
(This post was last modified: 29-Jul-2016, 13:42 by Jwg1749.
Edit Reason: added P.S.
)
(29-Jul-2016, 13:25)GuillaumeB Wrote: As a matter of interest Matt what you think it should be and why?
This isn't a trick question, I'm genuinely interested in understanding your thoughts on this.
Guillaume
Hi Guillaume,
I don't have a figure in mind, only a vague sense that, assuming both 120 and 200 are upgradable to 220 Pro, the upgrade cost for the 120 and 200 should reflect the fact that 200 owners made a greater original cash investment. Maybe the differential should be somewhere in the region of £500 -- I don't really know.
I also find it odd that the 120 isn't being upgraded to the 130 Pro. Has anyone come up with a rationale for why this is not the case? (Apologies if I've missed something important.)
Matt
P.S. Devialet Support admitted to me that this point has been raised by "many users" (their words).
Sonos Connect (W4S) > DSpeaker Antimode 2.0 > Sanders Magtech > Martin Logan Montis
Sonos Connect (W4S) > Devialet 200 > Vivid V1.5
Silver Phantoms (just the two)
London
London
