29-Jul-2016, 14:11
(29-Jul-2016, 14:00)Ron McKernan Wrote:(29-Jul-2016, 13:37)Jwg1749 Wrote:(29-Jul-2016, 13:25)GuillaumeB Wrote: As a matter of interest Matt what you think it should be and why?
This isn't a trick question, I'm genuinely interested in understanding your thoughts on this.
Guillaume
Hi Guillaume,
I don't have a figure in mind, only a vague sense that, assuming both 120 and 200 are upgradable to 220 Pro, the upgrade cost for the 120 and 200 should reflect the fact that 200 owners made a greater original cash investment. Maybe the differential should be somewhere in the region of £500 -- I don't really know.
I also find it odd that the 120 isn't being upgraded to the 130 Pro. Has anyone come up with a rationale for why this is not the case? (Apologies if I've missed something important.)
Matt
P.S. Devialet Support admitted to me that this point has been raised by "many users" (their words).
Thank you very much for this initiative. I am sure you will be very happy when D120 owners now would have to pay € 500 more for their upgrade, and even happier if they were entirely exluded from the 220pro upgrade plan.
I think none of the 200 are owners expecting 120 owners to pay more but we want to pay less as 200 owners. Perhaps if you are not plannig to upgrade your 120 (if u are an owner), I can trade my 200 with your 120 and some cash so it will help me to decrease my upgrade cost so win win for both of us
