16-Jul-2016, 20:12
(14-Jul-2016, 16:48)thumb5 Wrote:(14-Jul-2016, 16:23)nicoludio Wrote:(14-Jul-2016, 15:27)IanG-UK Wrote: He also explained that the theoretical optimum mix (but practically unachievable) between A and D was 0% A and 100% D; but that the changes had moved them from 2%/98% to 0.5%/99.5%, improving precision by a factor of four.
Thanks, Ian, for the detailed report.
What does the theoretical optimum mix of the A ratio of 0:100 mean? Does that mean that the Pro series require less Class A output than before to produce the equivalent power output (when compared to the existing series)?
I am trying to understand the concept of precision having being improved by a factor of 4 as well
That had me thinking too. I suppose the percentages refer to current delivery, and the "ideal" is that the class A delivers no current, just ensures that the output voltage is correct. Which sounds all very nice, but unless the class A can provide /some/ current, how can it affect the voltage. My interpretation is that the new control software means the class D can be more accurate so the class A has to deliver less current to correct for inaccuracies; thereby the class A can be more accurate itself and act more like an "ideal" voltage reference.
ETA: so (paradoxically?) because the class A is delivering less current, you're actually hearing a purer class A sound.
seems a plausible explanation to me!
Devialet Original d'Atelier 44 Core, Job Pre/225, Goldmund PH2, Goldmund Reference/T3f /Ortofon A90, Goldmund Mimesis 36+ & Chord Blu, iMac/Air, Lynx Theta, Tune Audio Anima, Goldmund Epilog 1&2, REL Studio. Dialog, Silver Phantoms, Branch stands, copper cables (mainly).
Oxfordshire