24-Sep-2016, 19:14
Hi Srima,
Thanks for sharing. This is interesting.
Having extensively used OmniMic and REW, I would abound that REW is easier to use in the sense that, once you have made your measurements, you can exploit them in many different ways. The mic you have included with OmniMic is supported by REW and you can reuse its calibration file.
Having said that, it would be useful to have more detailed views (say with a smoothing of 1/12th octave or 1/24th octave instead of 1/3rd which is very favorable as you know). Also, it would be helpful to have a look at the time domain, say for instance the phase representation, just to be able to check if the speakers of the Phantom are correctly time-aligned. The step response would also give us an indication about this correct time alignment of speakers.
Could you share this with us ?
Thanks in advance.
Thanks for sharing. This is interesting.
Having extensively used OmniMic and REW, I would abound that REW is easier to use in the sense that, once you have made your measurements, you can exploit them in many different ways. The mic you have included with OmniMic is supported by REW and you can reuse its calibration file.
Having said that, it would be useful to have more detailed views (say with a smoothing of 1/12th octave or 1/24th octave instead of 1/3rd which is very favorable as you know). Also, it would be helpful to have a look at the time domain, say for instance the phase representation, just to be able to check if the speakers of the Phantom are correctly time-aligned. The step response would also give us an indication about this correct time alignment of speakers.
Could you share this with us ?
Thanks in advance.
