27-Nov-2016, 20:50
(This post was last modified: 27-Nov-2016, 20:54 by Hifi_swlon.)
I went from 200 to 250 pro so not the same comparison, but to give my comments on the upgrade; while I find some aspects of it not quite to my taste, I general I prefer it - but I can easily see why some people might not.
That said, lack of detail at any volume is definitely not something I experience. I also find more presence and sparkle in the pro. But in my setup the extra detail extraction, especially at the top end, can at times make things sound very thin and not lifelike in my opinion.
How long did you have a 250 for? What firmware were you using on the 250? You may well have just become very used to the sound and it's a sound you prefer. But if you were using older firmware and hadn't heard the latest, or a pro, it could well be quite a shock.
I did play with the toe in of the speakers a bit too.
That said, lack of detail at any volume is definitely not something I experience. I also find more presence and sparkle in the pro. But in my setup the extra detail extraction, especially at the top end, can at times make things sound very thin and not lifelike in my opinion.
How long did you have a 250 for? What firmware were you using on the 250? You may well have just become very used to the sound and it's a sound you prefer. But if you were using older firmware and hadn't heard the latest, or a pro, it could well be quite a shock.
I did play with the toe in of the speakers a bit too.
>>> 1st Place Award: Devialet, last decades most disappointing technology purchase. <<<
