Moderation poll

[IanG-UK]

I voted no on the basis that I don't think it is required. We are fortunate enough to have well behaved members and that, even when they are divergence of opinions, discussions are remaining informative, polite and do not turn into flame wars nor trolls.

Splitting, tidying and maintaining topics in the background would not hurt, but this is a lot of efforts and investment from the moderating people.

Last but not least, I end up consulting the forum not based on topics and it's organization but using either the 'view New posts' or 'view today's posts' options, hence my low prioritization of reorganizing the forum.

Best regards and thank you all for this forum.

Jean-Marie Calmel

Excellent post and I agree that the quiet moderation currently deployed so far is the preferred way forward. 

Just be thankful that we have a forum which bears no resemblance to the moderated forums of WBF, PF and HFW. 

Tidying up is a prolonged and thankless task - and maybe the best way is just to leave things as they are OR put threads not used for two years into an archive slot, accessible but not part of general threads.