11-Aug-2017, 22:33
Best I can tell from the video resolution, the graphs are essentially the same, but their conclusion is there's a noticeable difference. I know frequency/amplitude plots don't tell the whole picture but....
One thing I would say is it seems the mic is very close to the speaker, so I'm not sure how much of the room effect would be captured there. Will try and do some of my own too next week.
Isoacoustics replied but completely ignored my request for data. I've re-asked just in case they missed the question (doubtful). But disappointing for pro audio - it would hardly give away any secrets but would hopefully show what they intend then to do. In light of their reply to Confused, they must have some otherwise they wouldn't know the weight-based curve.
One thing I would say is it seems the mic is very close to the speaker, so I'm not sure how much of the room effect would be captured there. Will try and do some of my own too next week.
Isoacoustics replied but completely ignored my request for data. I've re-asked just in case they missed the question (doubtful). But disappointing for pro audio - it would hardly give away any secrets but would hopefully show what they intend then to do. In light of their reply to Confused, they must have some otherwise they wouldn't know the weight-based curve.
>>> 1st Place Award: Devialet, last decades most disappointing technology purchase. <<<
