22-Feb-2016, 23:58
(22-Feb-2016, 20:26)Antoine Wrote: I read it on computeraudiophile.com (see the link I provided) however reading it again I see now that Julian from Mutec actually corrected that statement.I had read Guillaume's posts. They were referring to MC-3+. And the enthusiasm of Guillaume was quite moderate.
Regarding the D1, Guillaume just wrote above your post and last post on the previous page that the MC-3+ improves the D1's performance so I would guess the MC-3+ USB would improve it more. Did you miss his posts or do I misunderstand you?
Stacking multiple MC-3's BTW probably isn't something I am going to do. I simply don't have the space unless I buy a new TV/AV cabinet.
I wanted to state that, in my opinion, and regarding the MC-3+ USB, it would be interesting to check in which position it would be the most appropriate to put it, relative to the d1-reclocker, depending on the relative performance of their clock.
I also wanted to point out that, if two reclocking operations were in general better than one (see the door metaphor), there were some cases where this was not working, and that it was important for each of us to form our own judgement.
I have strong convictions in this field, based on my own experience, but I feel it is important, given the scepticism of some readers, that they forge their own opinion :-)